ArguMentor

An innovative tool for structured and collaborative debates.

ArguMentor is an innovative platform for structured debates and collaborative exchanges, designed to transform unproductive discussions into constructive conversations through clear rules and proposition evaluation.

The concept

ArguMentor transforms sterile discussions into constructive exchanges. The platform enforces clear rules and structured evaluation of propositions.

No more debates that degenerate into personal attacks or go in circles: ArguMentor guides you toward productive dialogue.

Debate structure

Debates are centered on concise and clear propositions that participants evaluate on a uniform scale, promoting complete understanding of the subject.

common.note : ArguMentor emphasizes answer clarity, avoiding ambiguities and unnecessary detours, while limiting rhetorical techniques that mask bad faith.

The rules of the game

Mandatory self-evaluation

Proposers must first evaluate their own propositions before submitting them.

Concise propositions

Each proposition must be brief and contain only one argument at a time.

Precise references

Citations must point to relevant sections of sources.

Prior evaluation

You must evaluate all previous propositions before submitting a new one.

Distinctive features

🎯

Collective evaluation

Clearly visualize points of agreement and disagreement within the group.

💬

Clear answers

The structured format minimizes ambiguities and misunderstandings.

🛡️

Conflict management

Strict rules reduce insults and derailments.

📋

Traceability

All propositions are numbered and tracked for easy reference.

Participant flexibility

Participants can modify their evaluations at any time during the debate. This flexibility allows:

  • Adjusting your position based on new arguments
  • Recognizing when you've changed your mind
  • Encouraging intellectual honesty

The benefits

Efficiency

Structured debates reach constructive conclusions faster

🌈
Diversity

Encourages multiple proposers, enriching the discussion

🔍
Transparency

All propositions are tracked and numbered

🤝
Respect

Guidelines foster respectful and productive environments

Why debate this way?

Online (and offline) debates often degenerate because there's no framework. ArguMentor imposes discipline that:

  • Forces thinking before speaking
  • Prevents drowning the debate under multiple arguments
  • Requires considering others' arguments
  • Allows seeing where disagreements really lie

Problems solved by ArguMentor

Personal attacks

Strict rules prevent ad hominem attacks and maintain focus on arguments.

Discussions going in circles

Proposition numbering allows following the thread and avoiding repetition.

Gish gallop (argument flooding)

One proposition per intervention prevents overwhelming the interlocutor.

Hidden bad faith

Mandatory self-evaluation forces honesty about one's own positions.

Access ArguMentor

Free access on psy-x.fr

About Psy-X

Psy-X is a collective dedicated to exploring critical thinking. Through in-depth articles, stimulating debates and interactive tools, Psy-X promotes conscious and balanced reflection. www.psy-x.fr.